Very little added cost over the inexpensive Colormunki but performance that rivals the $3000+ Hubble in many ways. IMHO, the Display 3 seems to be the most popular solution for enthusiasts. Last edited by sh4dow on Wed 11:55 pm edited 1 time in totalĪh yes! Sorry - there are two versions of the Colormunki. "display" seems to be the keyword in most of these products in regards to whether they're colorimeters or not. (and actually - the black sensor error as it is demonstrated in the article also shows that)
#COLORMUNKI DISPLAY VS SPYDER 3 PRO#
I1display pro (not to confuse with all the other i1 pro hardware - which are all spectrophotometers) and colormunki display: colorimeter according to both that article and the x-rite website, it's like the following:Įye-one pro and colormunki photo: spectrophotometer I think you're mixing some things up here. Support our site by using our affiliate links. It's slow because it's a spectro (like the EyeOne Pro). If the colormunki gains more software support in terms of home theatre video calibration then it's one we'll look at. Last edited by sh4dow on Wed 11:51 pm edited 1 time in total they say the downside is that it's a lot slower. $170 for accuracy that according to the article is on par with the best colorimeters. All the ones we tested were manufactured mid-2009 and later.Īnd colormunki display might be worth adding to the FAQ, considering its apparently amazing price/accuracy-ratio. Older (pre-2009) Spyder 3 units showed high unit-to-unit variability. I just found this interesting review showing that at least spyder 3 colorimeters produced since mid-2009 might be more accurate than eye-one (at least those from the 2nd generation - eye-one 2 LT and the likes)!
0 kommentar(er)
